Barefoot Blog


Misinterpretation of the Gospel Message across Cultures (Part 3 of 5)

The notion of the “Cosmic Race,” popularized among Latinos by Mexican author Jose Vasconcelos, is a philosophical basis for pride in the mixture of races. González writes, there is “no single perspective or a single clue to ‘reading with Hispanic eyes.’” Therefore a people of varied backgrounds sharing a single identity is dubious. However, this is Paul’s vision and the message he preaches to the Gentiles. In his letter to the Ephesians, Paul (or one of his disciples) writes that Jesus’ “purpose was to create in himself one new person.” He (or she) continues with the message of solidarity, “Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and aliens, but fellow-citizens with God’s people and members of God’s household.” (Eph. 2:15, 19 NIV) This “unity in the faith,” misunderstood by Paul’s contemporaries, has also been misinterpreted in every generation since.

Before meeting Jesus, Saul/Paul’s aim was to eliminate the threat that the new sect of Jesus followers represented to Judaism. Ethnic and religious purity, which was tied to the ultimate conquest of Israel’s Messiah over all nations, defined his worldview. Sadly Spanish missionary endeavors in the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries interpreted the Scriptures envisioning a kind of religious purity through coerced conversion in Latin America, which appears to be an amalgamation of the purity ethic of Second Temple Judaism and the conquest ethic of the Roman Empire. Modern Protestant missionary endeavors continued a triumphalist interpretation, albeit separated from military coercion, by expanding into the “frontiers,” which implies redrawing the “borders” of Western civilization. Western individualism, informed by the Protestant Reformation’s doctrine of justification by faith, which possesses an important “supporting role” in Paul’s gospel, became the central understanding the expanding Protestant missionary enterprise. Today, when Westerners read the stories of Moses at the burning bush (Exo. 3:1-10) and the Samaritan woman at the well (John 4:5-35), they read how the individual finds God, rather than a calling, “to go back to their people to do the work of God with and among them.” Westerners interpret the purpose of the Church (and of the Bible) to be a functionary agent to meet individual needs, rather than an expression of the gospel itself and a “foretaste of the kingdom.” This misinterpretation of the gospel message has resulted in a new form of “exile,” “a dislocation from the center,” as people are either left out, pushed out, or choose to remain outside the center.

Comments Off


Did Jesus Come to Affirm the Law?

Do you ever wonder what Jesus really meant when he spoke of the “law and the prophets”? He was referring to the Scriptures, those that we now identify as the Old Testament and some other apocryphal texts. The law and the prophets refers to the testimony of God’s word to his people and the traditions of those people. These two, testimony and tradition, converge and clash at the time of Jesus.

Jesus represents that clash; he had a high regard for the law and he also challenged the teachers of the law. He said he came to “fulfill” the law, but there are looming questions that arise from his behavior. He obviously broke the Sabbath to provoke the Pharisees and to make a point about how we are to interpret the law.

Jesus announces that the kingdom has come. What did he mean by that? The kingdom is the “place” where God’s rule is evident. God rules all things, but his rule is limited by something. Otherwise, Jesus would not even need to announce “the kingdom has come near you.” What limits God’s rule? Traditions.

Jesus said, “thus making void the word of God through your tradition that you have handed on. And you do many things like this.” (Matt. 7:13) When he makes the announcement that the kingdom is near, we need to see that it is Jesus who is the fulfillment of the law. The rule of God has finally come, not in written code, but in the person of Jesus. Jesus declares that the law is accomplished in him.

By saying “the law is accomplished”, was he implying that the law is actually temporary?

Now that Jesus has come, the law is fulfilled, and the law is accomplished. Do you sense the tension in Matthew’s Gospel regarding obedience to the law? Matthew’s congregation apparently needs some understanding, and so do we. We need help navigating between the amazing liberty we have received in Christ and the dangerous license that has too often resulted.

Jesus did not abolish the law. In fact, he calls for an adherence to the law, which is “greater than the Pharisees.” How do we live free from the law and at the same time under the “rule of God” as citizens of the kingdom of God?

Jesus rules his kingdom. Jesus critique of the Law is not so much about obedience to a strict set of Pharisaic laws, but rather the heart motive behind that obedience. Jesus critiqued the traditions of the Pharisees, which made the Law of “no effect.” Jesus sought to reveal the underlying kingdom values reflected in the law, while also unmasking the dangerous effects of tradition. Jesus calls us to a deeper obedience, a new way of life in the kingdom of God.



Kingdom of Heaven

Have you ever considered the difference between the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God?  There’s really no difference. Why the question? Because Matthew’s Gospel writer used “kingdom of heaven” and chose not to use the Name of “God.” This was likely due to the author’s sensibilities as a devout and scholarly Jew. Most of us understand from Scripture that the kingdom of God will include a future new heaven and new earth, however that kingdom is not just a place. The kingdom of heaven is the present reign of God.

To me, the “reign” has always been the “place” where the presence of God is honored. The kingdom is not just the “place” where God is present. God is everywhere. God’s presence in a place should be enough, but without honoring God’s presence with faith, he apparently does not reign in that place. In Mark’s Gospel (Mark 6:5 RSV), it says Jesus “could do no deed of power there, except that he laid his hands on a few sick people and cured them.” Why? Because the people questioned, doubted, and rejected Jesus, the carpenter’s son.

This tension between the extravagant grace and riches of God’s kingdom on one hand and the earthy, calloused hands, and dusty toes of Jesus the carpenter’s son, is making me think about my own expectations as a citizen of the kingdom. Too often we have equated the kingdom of God with the Church. They are not the same, though we hope God is truly honored in his Church. What is important is to see that God may be honored outside the Church and the kingdom of God may show up in odd places like nightclubs, college classrooms, and tatoo parlors. My understanding of Jesus is changing as I consider the dusty roads, the smells, the difficulties of life in Palestine. Jesus was not only born in an animal stall, he lived without indoor plumbing and refrigeration. God chose the setting to introduce his kingdom. Consider the smell of rotting fish and sweat in the heat of the Judean countryside.

Jesus might have been handsome in the eyes of his mother. However Scripture tells a different story. Isaiah 53 tells of the coming Christ and declares “he was despised and rejected…and we esteemed him not.” The expectations of his own people, those who waited for their Messiah, were far different. Instead of a king who would deliver them from their oppressors, the one who stood before them defiantly disobeyed their traditions and pronounced judgment on their nation. This carpenter’s son is the king. We will likely be surprised in the same way as were the people of Palestine.

This messy incarnation and bodily resurrection of Jesus implies an “earthy” eternity, in which he (and we) have feet, hands, eyes, ears, mouths, and taste buds, perhaps with bodily functions. How Jesus reveals the kingdom, through special grace and common grace, is not going to be recognized by everyone. Some will despise and reject the very witness of his kingdom sent to them. If we love our traditions and our religious expectations of God’s glory and power, we may miss the simple expression of the kingdom in the earthy containers of his servants touching the lives of others. This king and his kingdom is likely still far different from our expectations.

Comments Off


Adoption, Attachment Disorder, Still Born Christians & Falling Short of Transformation

My wife, Mary, and I adopted our daughter Rebecca from China in 1999. Like many adopted children, our daughter needed therapy to correct a Reactive Attachment Disorder.  Because she did not bond with her birth mother, she did not develop parts of her brain; there was a physiological disorder that caused her to resist being held. This resistance, if unchecked, would develop into severe anti-social behavior even into adulthood.

What most of us experience immediately after birth and during infancy is consistent loving touch, mostly with loving parents. The junction between nerve cells, called synapses, consist of a minute gap across which impulses pass by diffusion of a neurotransmitter. During the early infancy, intimate bonding experience with loving parents cause these synapses to “fire” and make connections to develop our brains and our personalities.

When this developmental disorder occurs, frequently but not exclusively in cases of adoption, a painful therapy is required. Without extended periods of “holding time” therapy, our daughter would never have rested in our arms or found her place in her new family. She fought and kicked and screamed when we held her. Though we fought back the tears through this painful therapy, Rebecca experienced an unimaginable pain just because we held her in our arms. These sessions would last up to an hour until, exhausted and weary, Rebecca would collapse and fall asleep in a peaceful rest in mom’s or dad’s arms.

This process has me thinking. Could it be that new-born Christians need “holding time”? Could it be that some, or many, young Christians are never “bonded” into the family of God? Could it be that new born Christians are “still born” with nobody to bond to, no intimate family in which to be nurtured?

God’s kind intention is for every Christian to be adopted into the family of God. Jesus has already “bought” us with a “price” (1 Cor. 6:20); the adoption fee has been paid. This costly initiative is Christ’s sacrifice. Newly adopted babies are bonded to loving parents, unaccompanied by their conscious choice.   Likewise, God has appointed men and women in the Body of Christ to welcome strangers, those who have found life in Christ, as family. It is in the conscious choice to “adopt” new believers into the family that real life is imparted and nurtured.

Before we adopted our little girl, we toured and served China’s orphanages with university student interns in 1998. One of the government orphanages was appalling. We were ushered into a room full of older children and young teenage Chinese children that had never been adopted. Rejected and institutionalized, these orphans left their wooden bench, the only furniture in the stale concrete room with one window, and surrounded us. Standing there with little more than old and frayed pajamas, they threw their arms around us. My heart broke as they held onto me saying, “Baba” (Daddy).

I believe God calls us to go to where life happens, to the neglected and rejected, to adopt disaffected people. If we do not, then “un-adopted” girls and boys will grow up with no vital connection to their Father in heaven. We are the Body of Christ. If young Christians are not bonded, they will become like so many un-adopted children, making due in an institutional environment, which may be nothing more than a Sunday church service.

What I am suggesting here is that we need a deeper, wider, and more complete vision for evangelism. Modern evangelism has reduced the Good News to an argument to be won, a list of bullet points. Most will agree that conversion is the “born again” experience, born of the Spirit, delivered from darkness into the kingdom of Jesus. But this is not the Gospel. The Gospel is a radical proclamation of Jesus as Lord over all; it’s not just about conversion. It’s about transformation.

How does transformation happen? Transformation goes beyond conversion. Bob Moffit defines biblical transformation as “the process of restoration to God’s intentions of all that was broken when humanity rebelled against God at the Fall. It is not the same as spiritual conversion, though it begins there. It is God’s work. He calls his people to participate with him in it. This ongoing process will not be fully completed until Christ returns.”
– Bob Moffit, October 2005 issue of Evangelical Missions Quarterly.

I pray for transformation, that the Body of Christ would not settle for institutional church. Failing to bond, un-adopted Christians will never thrive or participate with the Father in the ongoing process of transformation of creation, especially fallen humanity.

Comments Off


Emerging Church Pattern #9: Leading as the Body

Leadership, which aligns a church community to a vision, can often fail to fulfill the purpose of the kingdom, aligning people in relationship, loving God and loving our neighbors. Natural leaders emerge when they are given the permission, especially as they are encouraged to exercise and grow in their spiritual gifts. Serving within the existing structure of a church, leaders will understand that humility in leadership is acknowledging one’s “own limitations as well as the gifting and the leadership authority and potential of others.” (Bolgers & Gibbs, Emerging Churches, p. 199) They know the leadership gifts of apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers are active in the Church today. Those gifted leaders are not limited to the ordained staff; they are the spiritual “fathers” and “mothers” in authentic community. They are also emerging leaders who are finding their place in the Body of Christ.

In this time of significant change, both within the church and in the broader culture, leadership becomes the crucial issue. We must set as a high priority the building of new leaders who will function as facilitators on teams. Team leadership is shared and not invested in one person. Leaders in an emerging church need not “set an agenda, but rather facilitate a process by which the community sets the agenda.” (Bolgers & Gibbs, p. 204) This shared leadership posture will support and foster a new kind of emerging church consisting of several smaller churches, Commission Groups, with “no control exerted over [them].” (p. 209)

Next week: Putting together the Nine Patterns of Emerging Churches



Western Chuch

This week I’m looking at the Western Church. Many formations of the Church have emerged all over the world. However, the Western Church emerged by aligning with Roman power. This formation has resulted in centuries of failure to truly bear witness to the good news of the kingdom of God. Despite human failing, the Holy Spirit continued to pour out into many cultures, such as Ireland, with little structural support.

Today, the Western mindset tempts church leaders around the world to continue the Roman formation of structural, positional, and hierarchical or authoritarian power. Even after the Reformers re-articulation of the “Priesthood of All Believers,”  most church structures continue to fail to demonstrate it. Churches in the late twentieth century have gone a step further, linking success to the capacity to meet the religious needs of members. Because leaders are presenting “church” as a spectator event, cultural christians pick and choose the church gathering that most appeals to their individual needs or wants.

Too often captive to a materialist and consumer culture, most church-goers do not see how the Western Church has been the beneficiary of institutional power, wealth, and influence. Therefore many Christians fail to represent Christ and His kingdom through community.

If we are captive, what steps should we take to break free to truly become a community witnessing to the good news of the kingdom of God?

Comments Off